Going through numerous articles on CJI Gogoi sexually harassing a woman employee in his office I got the impression that she simply wishes herself to be the judge of her own case or at least she wanted to appoint judges of her own choice on the panel, or she would cry foul. Astonishing!
“The clubbed and fabricated system which made women sacrosanct and men the devil incarnate must go under scrutiny. Time and again women atrocities on men and his other family members have surfaced but of no avail. There seems to be a deeper conspiracy to spoil the entire social fabric by destroying the family system. It may be a ploy on the same line as ‘divide and rule’ which may be termed as destroy and rule. When there is no concept of family, which can only be possible in the absence of a woman, the entire society will be unhinged. Today’s so-called liberated woman is creating havoc. She is liberated to become the slave of her whims, fancies, and an illusory glamour. She just knows to run after them, bulldozing everything that comes her way.”
I’m asking the so-called great upholders of an extra-mile justice to women:
Did you watch the video clip of a small girl posted on Facebook accusing her nani, Kiran Bedi, to stop harassing her father? Do have an iota of doubt in the sincerity of that innocent girl? Kiran Bedi’s gubernatorial position coupled with her experience as a strong and astute police officer has given her enough clout to sidestep legal ambits. Her arrogance is a time tested and well-acknowledged fact. Being a woman gives her an added advantage. Any man of her stature would have suffered the worst in a similar given situation while she goes scot free which is also for being a woman, apart from her powerful position. A man of similar stature would have been stripped of his position by now. I wish it were within the scope of this article to add the video clip of the small girl in which she is imploring her nani, Bedi, to stop harassing her father by slapping false cases on him.
NGOs masquerading in the women empowerment are turning a blind eye to these facts of our society just because it is about throwing them and their ilk out of business. There is a group of some enthusiasts called Lady Finger which has been crying hoarse over women’s issues. I ask them did you finger yourselves you Lady Finger torch bearers watching this video clip?
How many of such cases are there pending with the courts spoiling thousands of families around the world? Just visit any small court of law and you will find a huge number of such cases. Most of them trash, fake and fabricated.
A very senior woman professor of law, who recently got retired from Jamia Millia Islamia, having had the honor of being a VC of a university also, observed in her class full of boys and girls (my son being one of them) made a very strong statement that in most cases women are the harassers and men sufferers, wherein the event of judgement against women men usually condone them despite all sorts of tortures inflicted on them.
When shall we rise against these atrocities on men? How long shall we go on giving them passes of being naive and sacrosanct?
This woman in question who has implicated the CJI has been taking the full advantage of being a woman, and the prevailing judicial system of tilting the balance in favour of women. Don’t you think the time is important in cases? Is it wrong to question her for the delay in raising the issue? How can you say that this or any woman in similar cases did not take advantage of her womanhood? Who knows if she had laid a honey trap on these men? Are women not into the business of entrapment of men who matter at the behest of powerful lobbyists? Who should be held guilty in case of that? Do women not lure men? Is it only men who run after women? Are all women born saints? Does the entire pack of these hounding dogs believe so? Is it rocket science to understand that it’s quite easy for some unscrupulous women to lure men and then vilify them having used them over a period of time, or maybe that she was able to use him up to a certain level beyond which she couldn’t so she made the fuss of it?
I know a young woman, in collusion with her mother, who posed as her elder sister, entrapped a young dynamic enterprising engineering graduate, keeping the entire male members of the family in the dark, to finance the expenses of the study of the girl in a private medical college throughout her study period, posing as a fiancee, and then leaving him in a lurch, the family got her married to a doctor, who lived in the UK.
This is not a fairy tale. Our mentality of women all right and men all wrong gives rise to such cases. Why do women get exploited for years on the promise that he will marry her? How would you deny it being a live-in relationship? Why this duality of the court of law should exist? Why do courts allow a live-in relationship? How can you distinguish between a live- in relationship and the exploitation of a woman, if she cries foul? Do you have any set of rules for that? Well, the courts allow for a consensual affair. Agreed. This consensual affair may be in lieu of a favour. If that demand of favour crosses the limit and he says no to that how can these ‘Fingerites’ distinguish it from being an exploitation? How would the court decide such cases? What would our Women’s Commission say in this regard? Are such cases weird to our society? When shall we, as responsible citizens, take cognizance of that? We must do something ere the damage becomes irreparable.
By: Prof. Nasim Akhtar